口语辩论总结陈词稿

Dear chairman, judgers and fellow debaters, good afternoon. I am very glad with each other and argue for this friendly mach. Please allow me on behalf of our summary statement. At first, let me rephrase our view. That is “being a famous person is better than being an ordinary person”. According to our former expound, I will sum up our argument from the following two aspects.

On the one hand, for celebrity themselves, they are so well known surely because they are very excellent in certain aspect. However, their achievement is just due to their own hard work and don’t you think this is exactly the affirmation of the value of their self-efforts? I believe the answer of everybody must be “yes” for

everyman does wish to get the approval from others. In addition, we can see that ,compared to ordinary people, famous people have more manpower and material resources and so they are easy to do what they like Without thinking too much other chores ,like the problem of money or time. Moreover, celebrity has access to more outstanding people and so they can further promote themselves by

communicating and learning from each other.

On the other hand, In addition to their own away, for society and country, famous people have big influence and driving force. You should know most wealth of a country is created by celebrities. Besides, if you are a famous person, you will have chance to help more unfortunate people and enable their life better. Of course, they are also capable of making their family live a more rich life.

Surely, there is no double that famous people will face some unavoidable difficulties and annoyance .But just because of those small troubles, don’t you will stop the pursuit of excellence and the steps for dream? No! No! We are a passionate and enthusiastic generation after 90s. And we are unwilling to be a mediocre and

incompetent person. At this time, don’t you think being a famous person is better than being an ordinary person? If so, let’s work hard together to make us more and more remarkable and eventually become a celebrity. Well! That’s all. My statement has been over. Thanks for your listening.

 

第二篇:英语辩论总结陈词

对方辩友告诉我们经济发展的目的是为了人类更好的生存。但是过度重视经济的发展给我们带来什么?数据(海平面上升、温室效应)等,这些已经威胁到我们的生存。我想问对方辩友,这些真的是我们想要的么?我要告诉对方辩友的是,这些行为无异于杀鸡取卵。

对方辩友一直在试图说明环境问题可以由钱来解决,这一点我们不否认。但是对方辩友不明白,还以为我们还有时间先去发展经济,再来解决环境问题。20xx年,法国高达40o 热浪夺去了3万人的生命;20xx年,南亚大海啸死伤10万人,波及四个国家。这些都清楚地告诉我们,环境问题已经在发生,而不是即将发生。19xx年科学家估计地球上每天消失一个物种,而19xx年,仅仅十年的时间,这个速度已经上升到每小时消失一个物种。环境问题比我们想象的要严重。此时,我们只有清醒的认识到问题的严重性,拿出实际行动,将环保问题置于经济发展前面,才有可能解决因破坏环境而带来的生存威胁。

对方辩友环境保护的对象不仅仅是环境,更是在座的大家以及我们的后代。我们不否认经济的发展能带来大量的财富,但是,如果没有了人,没有了环境,这些钱只能用来买更华丽的棺材。

对方辩友提到弱势国家的饥饿问题。但是,不要忘记,我们只有一个地球,环境问题更是关乎全人类。如同海平面的上升威胁到的是全球小岛国家。所以我们应该面对的问题是经济发展是否应该放缓一下(这个问题对方一再忽视)。解决弱势国家的饥饿问题可以靠人道救援,经济发达国家应该分担弱势国家的经济压力,我们不允许弱势国家为了自己的发展而置全人类于不顾,尽管经济发达国家对于弱势国家的照顾不可能面面俱到,但这也不代表他们有权利为了经济发展而去破坏我们共同的环境。自私怎么会是弱势者的特权?

我们不能再重蹈覆辙,气温还在升高,飓风还在加速吹,物种还在加速消失。环保问题已不再是一个选择,我们已经没有选择。因为这关乎到全球60亿人的生存。

但我仍然认为以牺牲环境为代价来发展经济无异于杀鸡取卵。

1. 对方辩友说,任何对法治的侵犯都是不道德的。

My opponent says nothing that erodes the rule of law can be moral.

2. 亲爱的对方辩友,请现在就给我一个清楚的解释。

My dear fellow opponents, please give a clear answer now.

1. 经济发展的根本目的是提高人民生活水平。

My opponent says that the fundamental purpose of economic development is to improve the standard of living of the people. However,What has it brought to us to put too much emphasis on the economic development .data And this is threatening the survival of humanity as a whole.so I really want to ask my oppoent,all those are what we want. And I must to tell you that take sacrifices the

environment to be no different with the kill the goose as the price develop economy.

My dear fellow opponents have been trying to pin down that all of enviromental problems can be solved by by throwing money at it.however, My dear fellow opponents still couldn't understand the problems .The real question is: we really don’t have time to develop our economy first of all and then to solve the enviromental problems after it. In 20xx,

相关推荐