对方辩友告诉我们经济发展的目的是为了人类更好的生存。但是过度重视经济的发展给我们带来什么？数据（海平面上升、温室效应）等，这些已经威胁到我们的生存。我想问对方辩友，这些真的是我们想要的么？我要告诉对方辩友的是，这些行为无异于杀鸡取卵。

对方辩友一直在试图说明环境问题可以由钱来解决，这一点我们不否认。但是对方辩友不明白，还以为我们还有时间先去发展经济，再来解决环境问题。20xx年，法国高达40o 热浪夺去了3万人的生命；20xx年，南亚大海啸死伤10万人，波及四个国家。这些都清楚地告诉我们，环境问题已经在发生，而不是即将发生。19xx年科学家估计地球上每天消失一个物种，而19xx年，仅仅十年的时间，这个速度已经上升到每小时消失一个物种。环境问题比我们想象的要严重。此时，我们只有清醒的认识到问题的严重性，拿出实际行动，将环保问题置于经济发展前面，才有可能解决因破坏环境而带来的生存威胁。

对方辩友环境保护的对象不仅仅是环境，更是在座的大家以及我们的后代。我们不否认经济的发展能带来大量的财富，但是，如果没有了人，没有了环境，这些钱只能用来买更华丽的棺材。

对方辩友提到弱势国家的饥饿问题。但是，不要忘记，我们只有一个地球，环境问题更是关乎全人类。如同海平面的上升威胁到的是全球小岛国家。所以我们应该面对的问题是经济发展是否应该放缓一下（这个问题对方一再忽视）。解决弱势国家的饥饿问题可以靠人道救援，经济发达国家应该分担弱势国家的经济压力，我们不允许弱势国家为了自己的发展而置全人类于不顾，尽管经济发达国家对于弱势国家的照顾不可能面面俱到，但这也不代表他们有权利为了经济发展而去破坏我们共同的环境。自私怎么会是弱势者的特权？

我们不能再重蹈覆辙，气温还在升高，飓风还在加速吹，物种还在加速消失。环保问题已不再是一个选择，我们已经没有选择。因为这关乎到全球60亿人的生存。

但我仍然认为以牺牲环境为代价来发展经济无异于杀鸡取卵。

1. 对方辩友说，任何对法治的侵犯都是不道德的。

My opponent says nothing that erodes the rule of law can be moral.

2. 亲爱的对方辩友，请现在就给我一个清楚的解释。

My dear fellow opponents, please give a clear answer now.

1. 经济发展的根本目的是提高人民生活水平。

My opponent says that the fundamental purpose of economic development is to improve the standard of living of the people. However,What has it brought to us to put too much emphasis on the economic development .data And this is threatening the survival of humanity as a whole.so I really want to ask my oppoent,all those are what we want. And I must to tell you that take sacrifices the

environment to be no different with the kill the goose as the price develop economy.

My dear fellow opponents have been trying to pin down that all of enviromental problems can be solved by by throwing money at it.however, My dear fellow opponents still couldn't understand the problems .The real question is: we really don’t have time to develop our economy first of all and then to solve the enviromental problems after it. In 20xx,

 

第二篇：英语辩论 总结陈词

诚信的总结陈词：

综上所述，可得诚信是成才的基石，即使你很有才也必须遵守诚信的原则才能体现出你自身的社会价值。诚信与成才就像是一个人的左膀右臂一样，是一个也少不了的。现在的社会非常注重人的成才，但遗憾的是，我们的社会十分缺少诚信。一个人不想成才说明他失去了追求更高人生价值的动力，一个人没有诚信说明他失去了别人对自己的信任，将无法在社会上立足。如果说“善意的谎言”是“讲诚信”的延伸，那也就是说“善意的谎言”只对了一半，而且对的那一半是我们正方的观点。可见正方“讲诚信”才是真理！正方明显立于不败之地！

To sum up, but honesty is the foundation of success, even if you are just also must abide by the principle of good faith will show you own social value. The good faith and the success is like a valuable assistants of people, is a little also not. Now the community is very to success, but

unfortunately, our society is very lack of honesty. A people don't want to do that he lost his life value for higher power, a man does not have good faith that he lost his position of trust, will not be based on in society. If the "white lies" is "good faith" is outspread, that that is "a white lie" only half right, but also to the half that is our view of the square. Visible "good faith" as is true! As obvious invincible!

有悖公平的总结陈词：

综上所述，我们认为锦上添花不如雪中送炭。为使资源得到充分利用，我们强调共同富裕，世上所有的事情，没有绝对的公平，只有相对公平，而“住房补”则更加剧了贫富差距，严重时可能影响社会和谐。“持心如衡，以理为平”公平是人人可共享的社会资源的条件保障，所以践行公平是每个党政机关和公民的职责和义务。

To sum up, we think the brocade as urgently needed. To make resources can be fully used, we emphasize the common prosperity, all the things in the world, there is no fair, only relatively fair, and "housing fill", has intensified the gap between rich and poor, serious when may affect

social harmony. "The heart such as value, Daniel for flat" fair is everyone can share the social resources conditions security, so practice every

party and government organs and fair is the citizens of the responsibility and the duty.

对于造假事件，我方观点是严厉打击

Our view is for frauds, we should punish mercilessly

.This should be honest is the Chinese traditional virtue

.But in the 21 st century the quality have been completely overturn, its existence and its importance has also become the masses of the wave of discussion. And TangJun degree door "has become the fuse peremptory events, this is not in the door individual events, but honest the value of existence sex and importance. Our view is honesty is important, to be honest against the moral beliefs, to large crowds to cheat behavior, we should be severely hit, to punish mercilessly.

我方观点是深圳市房补门事件是有悖公平的

Our view is should not for billion-dollar enterprise executives extend housing subsidies, because brocade as urgently needed.

Make resources can't get enough of the optimization of the use, we emphasize the common prosperity, and the practice is the gap between rich and poor is more big, departing from our original intention, please remember that the world is not just to us as well as to you, I can't do too greedy shameless.

So we insist on shenzhen FangBu door event is against fair

,