英语辩论范文

辩论式范文

ATM-Automatic Teller Machine

(1) 有人认为自动取款机方便了我们的生活。

(2) 有人认为自动取款机给我们的生活带来了麻烦。

(3) 我的看法

范文:

Nowadays, ATM assumes an important part in people’s life. Like anything else, ATM has both favorable and unfavorable aspects.

ATM has so many advantages. In the first place, ATM is convenient. People can draw money from it with a card everywhere. Besides, it is safe. If you lose your card, you don’t need to worry about it because people have to enter password in order to get money. Most important of all, when people need money at night, they can find a round-clock ATM and easily draw his money. Therefore, ATM solves the problem of money shortage.

Just as everything has two sides, ATM is of no exception. To begin with, if someone inputs a wrong password three times by chance, ATM will withhold the card. To make matter worse, sometimes there is no money in some ATM, which makes people in urgent need of money quite disappointed or even indignant. Worst of all, if someone forgets password, he will not draw money from ATM. There is sometimes a long queue in front of ATM, which wastes a lot of time.

Despite these disadvantages, an increasing number of people tend to use the ATM for the sake of/out of convenience and safety. I believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. And the drawbacks of the ATM will be desired little by little.

For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition on the topic Can Money Buy Happiness? You should write no less than 100 words and you should base your composition on the outline (given in Chinese) below:

1. 有人认为金钱是幸福之本 (source of happiness)

2. 也有人认为金钱是万恶之源 (root of all evil)

3. 我的看法 范文:

Can money buy happiness? Various people have various answers. Some people think that money is the source of happiness. With money, one can buy whatever he enjoys. With money, one can do whatever he likes. So, in their minds, money can bring comfort, security, and so on. Money, as they think, is the source of happiness.

But there are still a lot of others who think that money is the root of all evil. Money drives people to steal, to rob, and to break the law. A lot of people

became criminals just because they were in search of money. And in the Western countries, there is nothing that can’t be bought by money. Many people lose their own lives when hunting it.

I think that money is essential to life and we cannot do without money. But even though money is necessary to life, it can’t buy happiness. Happiness is not something that can be measured by money. It is a state of mind. One can have plenty of money, with which he can buy whatever he wants, and at the same time he is not happy because he is never satisfied or he is troubled by various kinds of problems. Therefore, although money is necessary for a happy life, it can’t buy happiness.

For this part, you are allowed thirty minutes to write a composition on the topic Reading Selectively Or Extensively? You should write at least 100 words, and base your composition on the outline (given in Chinese) below:

1. 有人认为读书要有选择

2. 有人认为应当博览群书

3. 我的看法

Reading Selectively Or Extensively 范文:

Some people think when we read we should read selectively. That is to say, we should select some books we are interested in and ignore the others. Reading selectively can help us concentrate our limited time and attention on those selected books.

Others think we should read extensively. No matter what kind of book it is, we should look it over. We should read various kinds of books, whether we are interested in them or not. They maintain that reading extensively can help to enlarge our view and grasp the general knowledge in different fields.

In my opinion, the two reading ways have their roles respectively in our reading. However, the disadvantages of each methods are easy to see. If we only read the books we select or prefer, the framework of our knowledge may not be complete. Our knowledge would be rather limited. And if we read without selection, we may not have so much time and energy to be specialized in one

particular field. Therefore, the combination of the two methods is more reasonable.

 

第二篇:英语辩论问题

反方一辩:陈述观点

Thank you, we agree that develop tourism is needed, which can improve economic growth. But just think about the past decades, we have destroyed so many nature sources as well as environments in order to develop tourism. So our opinion is only when the environment is charming there will have the value of tourism. Beautiful environment will make people indulged in pleasures without stopping; enjoying amazing feeling of away from the messy world. Do you enjoy the through drama? The heroine will stay at that world not only because of the romantic love but also the purity nature view. But nowadays, almost all the tourists’ attractions have the trace of artificial modification. People almost cannot see nature’s original scenery. At the same time people start to voice new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment. Therefore, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past. That is, in the course of tourism development, we must consider the effect of distraction and accept that

environment protection is in the first place. Only in this way can we solve environmental problems in the future reasonably. What’s more, protecting environment is not only for us but also for our future generations. We have a responsibility to make sure that offsprings can see the true and original beauty of the earth rather than manual processing of the scenery. So we think that the travel mode in the cost of destroying nature original scenery is not desirable and environment protection must be in the first place. That’s all what I want to say. Thank you. 自由辩论

反对“旅游促进经济增长,故旅游第一位”

理由: Beautiful environment will make people indulged in pleasures without stopping; enjoying amazing feeling of away from the messy world.

We admit that tourism promotes economic development and economic construction is our country’s principle task. But we just cannot ignore the fact that most tourism industries

contribute to the deterioration of the environment, such as water and air pollution, appeared ozone holes and melted ice in Antarctic and so on. At the same time we have to insist on sustainable development while developing economy. We must attach great importance to the protection of the environment in the process of economic development. We acknowledge that environmental protection needs money ,but we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth. If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Tourism development must be on the premise of environmental protection. The policy of “returning farmland to forests and

grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the environment. Doesn’t it show that the environmental

protection is more important and tourism must depend upon a healthy and sustainable environment? Thank you.

反对“旅游丰富人民生活,故旅游第一位”

理由:At the same time people start to voice new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment. Well, I'm not so sure about that. Negative impacts from tourism occur when the level of visitor use is greater than the environment's ability to cope with this use within the acceptable limits of change. Uncontrolled conventional tourism poses potential threats to many natural areas around the world. It can put enormous pressure on an area and lead to impacts such as soil erosion, increased pollution, discharges into the sea, natural habitat loss, increased pressure on endangered species and heightened vulnerability to forest fires. It often puts a strain on water resources, and it can force local populations to compete for the use of critical resources. Tourism, especially nature tourism, is closely linked to biodiversity and the attractions created by a rich and varied environment. It can also cause loss of biodiversity when land and resources are strained by excessive use, and when impacts on vegetation, wildlife,

mountain, marine and coastal environments and water resources exceed the carrying capacity. This loss of biodiversity in fact means loss of tourism potential. At the same time, people start

to voice new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment. They are not paying their attention only on making life easy any more. On the contrary, they start to concern the environment protection and the link of environment and

economy as well. They realize that only when they make their efforts to protect the environment can they attain a sustainable life. Therefore we think environment protection is more important and it should go first. Thank you.

反对“先发展,后治理”

理由:protecting environment is not only for us but also for our future generations.

The opponent said, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” I want to question that when the animals and plants have died out, what the opponent debater protect with the

money and energy. If the economic growth delays for two years, we can wait two years to develop it .But, if the environmental protection delays two years, the species will be extinct, the resources will exhaust. The urgency like this can’t wait. What’s more, protecting environment is not only for us but also for our future generations. We have a responsibility to make sure that offsprings can see the true and original beauty of the earth rather than manual processing of the scenery. Just think that what would you answer if your child points out an ugly scenery

asking what it is and consider how he could have a comfortable life if the environment destroyed because of tourism

development gonging first ?So our side advocates the environmental protection should receive priority in China. Thank you.

反方四辩:总结陈述

Our opponent said, the tourism development is the first choice. The goal we develop the tourism today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future . If the economic growth lead to the pollution of the environment, can we live a better life? The excessive economic growth has caused

the greenhouse effect, which lead to sea-level rises. As a result, thousands of coastal dweller has to face the fate of the

migration. Moreover, the opponent also said, when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection. I’m afraid I disagree. Just think about the example of London, it became a developed city after Industrial revolution, but now, the government may be upset at the treatment of pollution. So does the tourism development. Such examples have a lot ,but they all tell us one truth , that is ,it will be too late to start managing when you realize that it is time to do so . So our side advocates the environmental protection should receive priority in China. Thank you.

相关推荐