Chapter One LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………….5
1.1 An Introduction of The Interpretive Theory …… ………………..6
1.1.1 Origin and Development of the Interpretive Theory ………… .7
1.1.2 Main Ideas of Interpretive Theory…… ……………….7
1.2 Previous Studies from the perspective of Interpretive Theory ……… ……11
1.2.1 Previous Studies from the perspective of Interpretive Theory in the west…11
1.2.2 Previous Studies from the perspective of Interpretive Theory in China ….12
1.1 An Introduction of The Interpretive Theory
THE LITERATURE REVIEW: A FEW TIPS ON CONDUCTING IT
What is a review of the literature? A literature review is an account of what has been
published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. Occasionally you will be asked to write one as a separate assignment (sometimes in the form of an annotated bibliography--see the bottom of the next page), but more often it is part of the introduction to an essay, research report, or thesis. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries.
Besides enlarging your knowledge about the topic, writing a literature review lets you gain and demonstrate skills in two areas:
1. information seeking: the ability to scan the literature efficiently, using manual or
computerized methods, to identify a set of useful articles and books
2. critical appraisal: the ability to apply principles of analysis to identify unbiased and valid
studies.
A literature review must do these things:
a) be organized around and related directly to the thesis or research question you are
developing
b) synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known
c) identify areas of controversy in the literature
d) formulate questions that need further research
Ask yourself questions like these:
1. What is the specific thesis, problem, or research question that my literature review helps
to define?
2. What type of literature review am I conducting? Am I looking at issues of theory?
methodology? policy? quantitative research (e.g. on the effectiveness of a new procedure)? qualitative research (e.g., studies )?
3. What is the scope of my literature review? What types of publications am I using (e.g.,
journals, books, government documents, popular media)? What discipline am I working in (e.g., nursing psychology, sociology, medicine)?
4. How good was my information seeking? Has my search been wide enough to ensure I=ve
found all the relevant material? Has it been narrow enough to exclude irrelevant material? Is the number of sources I=ve used appropriate for the length of my paper?
5. Have I critically analysed the literature I use? Do I follow through a set of concepts and
questions, comparing items to each other in the ways they deal with them? Instead of just listing and summarizing items, do I assess them, discussing strengths and weaknesses?
7. Have I cited and discussed studies contrary to my perspective?
8. Will the reader find my literature review relevant, appropriate, and useful?
Ask yourself questions like these about each book or article you include:
1. Has the author formulated a problem/issue?
2. Is it clearly defined? Is its significance (scope, severity, relevance) clearly established?
3. Could the problem have been approached more effectively from another perspective?
4. What is the author=s research orientation (e.g., interpretive, critical science, combination)?
5. What is the author=s theoretical framework (e.g., psychological, developmental, feminist)?
6. What is the relationship between the theoretical and research perspectives?
7. Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the author include
literature taking positions she or he does not agree with?
8. In a research study, how good are the basic components of the study design (e.g., population,
intervention, outcome)? How accurate and valid are the measurements? Is the analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the research question? Are the conclusions validly based upon the data and analysis?
9. In material written for a popular readership, does the author use appeals to emotion, one-sided
examples, or rhetorically-charged language and tone? Is there an objective basis to the
reasoning, or it the author merely Aproving@ what he or she already believes?
10. How does the author structure the argument? Can you Adeconstruct@ the flow of the argument to
see whether or where it breaks down logically (e.g., in establishing cause-effect relationships)?
11. In what ways does this book or article contribute to our understanding of the problem under
study, and in what ways is it useful for practice? What are the strengths and limitations?
12. How does this book or article relate to the specific thesis or question I am developing?
Final Notes:
? A literature review is a piece of discursive prose, not a list describing or summarizing one piece of literature after another. It=s usually a bad sign to see every paragraph beginning with the name of a researcher. Instead, organize the literature review into sections that present themes or
identify trends, including relevant theory. You are not trying to list all the material published, but to synthesize and evaluate it according to the guiding concept of your thesis or research question. ? If you are writing an annotated bibliography, you may need to summarize each item briefly, but should still follow through themes and concepts and do some critical assessment of material. Use an overall introduction and conclusion to state the scope of your coverage and to formulate the question, problem, or concept your chosen material illuminates. Usually you will have the option of grouping items into sections--this helps you indicate comparisons and relationships. You may be able to write a paragraph or so to introduce the focus of each section.
Prepared by Dena Taylor, Director, Health Sciences Writing Centre, and Margaret Procter, U of T Coordinator of Writing Support for use at the University of Toronto. Over 60 other files about university writing are available at http://www.utoronto.ca/writing/
BetterlatethanneverGoodmorningdearprofessorsItsmyhonourtohaveaspeechhereWel…
ThemeBetterlatethanneverTopicasimplefactInChinathereisanoldstorycalledbette…
BetterlatethanneverThereisastorythatwasapersonhadraisedalotofsheepOnedayAwo…
Unit3passage1BetterLatethanNever1Hewaslyingthereinthegrasshidingandthinking…
1Betterlatethannever迟做总比不做好2Whateverisworthdoingatallisworthdoing…
个人工作总结我是XX医院妇产科医生XX,现年XX岁,中共党员,20xx年x月毕业于XX学院临床医学专业,20xx年取得郧阳医学院临…
临河二小关工委年度工作总结临河区第二小学20xx.6临河二小关工委年度工作总结交流本年度,我校的关工委工作继续以邓小平理论和“三个…
一、租金征收工作租金征收目前仍然是我公司主要经济来源之一,我经营部紧紧围绕这一主题,想方设法,采取有效措施,昼可能为公司多创造经济…
新任监狱人民警察转正总结[1]我于20xx年参加XX省公务员考试,被录用为公务员,20xx年x月被分配到XX省**监狱工作。一年来…
本科毕业设计(论文)工作总结20xx年x月,我开始了我的毕业论文工作。时至今日,论文基本完成。从最初的茫然,到慢慢的进入状态,再到…