presenter：哈喽大家好，欢迎大家来到冠亚争夺战的现场，此刻将有幸观赏两支最强战队的精彩表现。今天的辩题是创新主要靠人vs创新主要靠物。首先我们将有请正反双方进行自我介绍。

presenter：Hello everyone, welcome to the scene of the Final battle for the debate, and has the privilege to watch the two top teams will show at the moment. Today's debate is mainly rely on innovation depends on the people or innovation depends on the substance(environment). First of all, both of the pro side and con side will have a self introduction.Firstly, please introduce yourself,.

有请正方作自我介绍

the pro side

A: I’m the first debater of pro side,my name is Qiu yingjie.

B: I’m the second debater of pro side,my name is Wang yanyan C: I’m the third debater of pro side,my name is Huang ting.

有请反方做自我介绍

Then,the con side

D: I’m the first debater of con side,my name is Zheng ronqiao. E: I’m the second debater of con side,my name is Zhang hanwei. F: I’m third debater of con side ,my name is Huang bobo

Presenter:好，话不多说，直接让我们进入唇枪舌战精彩激烈的自由辩环节。有请正方首先发起提问。

Presenter: Well, not much to say, let us enjoy the most exciting chapter

of the free debate directly.At the first,the pro side will have the initiated questions.

the second debater of pro side:请问对方辩友您知道创新过程中最活跃最根本的因素什么呢？

the second debater of pro side: Excuse me, the other party argue friend, may I ask if you know what is the most fundamental and most active factors in the innovation process?

the third debater of con side:那当然是能够反映各种需求为创新提供动力的物质因素啊，那么请问对方辩友是否知道人是在什么情况下想要创新的呢？

the third debater of con side: That is, of course, substance factors that can reflect all kinds of needs and provide the impetus for innovation. Then ask my fellow debates whether or not to know people in what circumstances want to innovate?

the second debater of pro side:当然是人有了新的想法和点子，如果没有人的创新意识，那么试问对方辩友创新又是如何推动的呢？

the second debater of pro side: Of course, there will be innovation after people have new ideas. If there is no sense of innovation, debaters on the opposing side, please explain that how to promote the innovation? the first debater of con side:对方辩友究竟有没有认真听我方论述呢？非要我们重复已陈述观念么？正是我们的整个大的社会条件和物质基础所折射出来的问题所在或者是不能满足某种需求啊。那么请问对

方辩友如果您连自行车都没见过的话，何来的创新点对自行车进行创新改进呢？

the first debater of con side: Is there any serious discussion made by the fellow debaters? Is it necessary for us to repeat what we have said? It is owing to entire social condition and material foundation that reflects the problem or some demand not met . Then we want to ask the fellow debaters a question, if you do not even have a bike bicycle, is it possible that the idea improving the bicycle occur ?

the third debater of pro side:谢谢对方辩友的提醒，这如您所说对自行车改进的前提是人见到自行车，那么我就想问对方辩友了，如果没有人，那又是谁来见到自行车谁来改进呢？

the third debater of pro side: Thank you for the other party argue friend`s reminder, this is the premise [n.前提] that the improvement of the side of the argument explain this ,if there is no one ,how to see the bike and recognize it?

the second debater of con side:对方辩友难道不知道自行车的发明正是从我们身边的动物身上得到的启发么？连发明都是从身边的环境实物中更何况改进呢，足以看出环境物质因素对我们创新的影响了。对方辩友可否阐述一下您所谓的人类的创新的灵感从何而来呢？ the second debater of con side: My fellow debaters ,don’t you know the invention of the bicycle is inspired from (来自于……的灵感，或启发)the animals around us? The inspiration of Invention comes from the

environment around us , Let alone（更不用说）ameliorate（英 ：

[?'mi?l??re?t] 美：[?'mil??'ret] vt. 改善；减轻（痛苦等）；改良：vi.变得更好）. It's enough to see the environment substance factors have great influence on our innovation. My fellow debaters ,Could you describe where are the inspiration of human innovation that you have mentioned from ?

the first debater of pro side:那当然是人们使用体验啊，只有人想要改善使用体验，想要满足更高的需求，才会想要去做才会有了创新啊。请问对方辩友，不管周围的物质环境如何影响人都没有想法没有实际行动的话，创新总不会是物质自己生出了一个物质然后取名叫创新吧？

the first debater of pro side: Of course they are user's experience and demand .Only people want to improve the use’s experience, want to meet a higher demand, will they want to do something special and inspire a creative idea. Excuse me,my dear friend of the con side, if people ignore the physical environment around themselves and do not have the idea,that there is no real action and also can’t be putted into practice(付诸行动).The innovation will not be the substance itself to give birth to a substance，and then called it innovation？

the third debater of con side:所以说对方辩友还是在承认人创新的前提是先从物质环境中得到的灵感与需求了？那么这种明显的前后顺序还不足以说明两者的重要性么？大千世界均以物质为基础，没有物

质人都不能存活，又何来创新呢？

the third debater of con side: So, my fellow debaters is still in recognition, the premise of human innovation is the inspiration and demand from the substance environment first, right? Is this obvious sequence of front and back is not sufficient to explain the importance of both? All the boundless universe based on substances, no one can survive without substances and how to innovate?

the second debater of pro side:对方辩友忧国忧民的情怀真是令人敬佩，我们都知道，时间上的前后是无法决定主次的，我先发明了火车后发明了飞机难道就一定说飞机比火车更具优势更便利么？

the second debater of pro side: The other party argue friend’s feelings of concerned about his country and his people is really admirable, as we all know, time of the thing appearance is unable to determine the priority. ([pra?'?r?t?] n. 优先；优先权；[数] 优先次序；优先考虑的事)Even people invented the train after the invention of the aircraft, but we don’t have to say that the plane is more advantages and more convenient ([k?n'vi?n??nt]adj. 方便的；适当的；[口语]近便的；实用的)than the train . the first debater of con side:对方辩友的例子真是不靠谱，因为A而产生了B和毫无因果关系前后产生的A和B根本不是一种逻辑关系啊。有了地基您才能构建楼房啊，光有天马行空的想法没有没有可以实施的目标那是白日梦在瞎想。

the first debater of con side:The example of the fellow debater is really

not reliable, because the logical relation that A occur because of B’s occurring is not the same as that A occurs by B without any relation at all. For example,you must build the house when you have dug the foundation. So it is just a daydream if you only have a powerful and idea but don’t have the realistic target.

the first debater of pro side:您别说白日梦也不是瞎想的，对方辩友难道不知道苯结构式的发现就是在梦里出现的么？

the first debater of pro side:Do you know?The day dream dose not come out of the blue(凭空而来), and the structure of benzene(苯环) is found in the dream?

the second debater of con side:据我所知那是由蛇而来的灵感吧。如果没有现实生活中发现者对蛇的了解，那梦也就只是做了个梦吧。 the second debater of con side: As far as I know that is inspired by the snake. If there is no real life discoverer understanding of snake, the dream is just a dream.

the third debater of pro side:人做个梦都能有发现有创新，那认真思考起来灵感还不如泉喷涌啊，对方辩友肯定知道霍金是靠什么解释和改善黑洞理论的吧，能否解释下么？

the third debater of pro side: Everyone can be a discoverer or a founder even when they are dreaming. Though, how about the situation when they take it seriously. I think the inspiration would like be a fountain [n.

喷泉]. My fellow debaters must know about it that what Hawkin explain and improve the theory of black holes is on. So, can you explain this? the third debater of con side:不怕对方辩友笑话，还真不知道呢。只知道，如果没有天文望远镜等相关设备的存在想必这依旧是个谜呢。物质不仅能够生物质，他还能够反馈信息提供问题来源，从而为创新提供了基础。对方辩友该怎么解释物质环境的变化对人类进化史的影响呢？

the third debater of con side: Not afraid of my fellow debates laugh at us, I really don't know. Just know, if there is no telescope and other related devices exist, presumably, this is still a mystery. Substance is not only able to produce substance, it can also provide feedback information and provide the source of the problem, thus providing the basis for innovation. My fellow debates how to explain the influence of the change of material environment on the evolution history of human beings.

the third debater of pro side:对方辩友您要偏题偏到哪里去呢？看来必须要把您拉回来了！人才有主观能动意识啊，请问对方辩友是人类推动社会的发展还是物质呢？

the third debater of pro side: My fellow debaters, you maybe have run the wrong way. It is the time to plush you. It is a common sense that only people have the subjective consciousness [n.意识]. So I want to enquire a important point. Which one is the driving force to promote

social development, the people or the substance?

the first debater of con side:那么我就想问了，人类是靠什么来推动物质的发展的呢？那必然是物质啊，正是整个大的自然环境提供拱了创新发展的前提基础，物质环境才是创新的根源啊！

the first debater of con side: Then I have a doubt, what dose human being base on to promote the development? it must be the material, it is that the entire natural environment provides a prerequisite for innovation and development, it’s the root of innovation.

the second debater of pro side:对方辩友难道不知道万物的发展创新都需要一定的推动力么？那么请问对方辩友您是否知道是谁来施展的推动力呢？

the second debater of pro side: The other side of the debater is not aware of the develop-ment and innovation of all things need a certain driving f-orce, So my fellow debaters ,could you please tell me who is the impeller ([?m'pel?] n. [动力][机] 叶轮；推进者)of driving force.

the second debater of con side:就算是推动力那也是有来源的，再说，物质是一切运动的属性，具有向上向前发展的本质特性，人的生活都离不开物质，更何况这种需要以物质为基础的创新呢？

the second debater of con side: Even if the impetus also has source. What’s more, substance is the property of all movements with the essential characteristic of onward and upward(向前向上发展). Human's life cannot leave substance，let alone this innovation that need based on

substance.

Presenter:时间到！感谢双方辩友的精彩表现！作为主持人的我啊看完双方的表演真是感触颇深，个人觉得着创新啊不仅需要人的作用也需要物质环境的作用，只有在两者的共同作用下才会发挥更好的效果，从而得到更加优异的创新成果。所以，今天，他们都是冠军！ 本次，比赛到此结束。

Presenter: Time is over!Thanks for the wonderful performance of the two sides! As a moderator of the debate i think the performance of the two sides is really fantastic and perfect.Personally feeling is that the innovation is not only in need for the impact of the human's role but also in need of the material environment.Only in the combined effect of the two elements will play a better result for the innovation, so as to get more excellent results. So today, both of them are champions! This is the end of the debate.

Starring

The first debater of pro side and Presenter----Qiu yingjie

The second debater of pro side----------------- Wang yanyan

The third debater of pro side---------------------Huang ting

The first debater of con side---------------------Zheng rouqiao

The second debater of con side------------------Zhang hanwei

The third debater of con side---------------------Huang bobo

Production crew

Scriptwriter/Director----------------------------- Qiu yingjie

Scriptwriter’s assistant--------------------all of us

PPT------------------------------------------the group called we are champions Reviewer------------------------------------Ling