文章题目 ： 提高油价能够有效缓解traffic and pollution

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

What other measures do you think might be effective?

正文：

With the rapidly boosting of economy and humanily society, a host of problems occurred at modern time which called public attention to, especially traffic and pollution problems . Some citizens suggest that increasing the price of petrol is better than any other way to solve these two major problems. In my opinion, this function will help to reduce the traffic and pullation problems ,however, would not be the best way to totally solve these problems.

Honestly, increasing the price of petrol would bring out an amount of benefits to the traffic in the urban area and the environment. Firstly, it would encourage people to travel through public transportation format, which would help to reduce the amount of private automobiles, which is quite good for the traffic in the urban area, Secondly , increasing the price means that less people to travel by their owning cars, which would contribute to reduce the emiting of polluate of cars .

On the contrary, to increase the price of raw oil would obverious do harm to the economy of the government, which will lead to the lack of fund to other foundation structions. Moreover, the citizens who are mid-class would feel stressful facing up to the higher and higher price of petrol. Lastly, in many developing countries like China, public transportation format would not meet the demond of public. So, increasing the price of petrol would not be the best way.

My suggesion is government should spare no effect to develop the function of public transportation format firstly, which would help to solve the traffic problem. Furthermore, a environmental-friendly sense should be created in the head of people, which would help to solve the environment problems. Lastly, government should pay more attention to make some rules and regulations to protect the environment from become worse and worse, rather than just pay lip serves.

注：在打字的时候，我注意到了一些问题，比如词写错了和一些动词没有用ing形式的，（比如最后一个阶段）这篇文章是我初稿。

 

第二篇：9分雅思作文范文(洛基英语提供)

洛基名师雅思写作范文，供大家参考：

Writing Task 2

　　You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

　　Some people think that the money spent on looking after animals in zoos or national parks would be better spent on improving the lives of the human population.

　　To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

　　Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

　　In the light of Hegelian philosophy that “whatever is true is reasonable; whatever is reasonable is true”, I wouldn’t simply reject the notion that animals should be looked after in zoos or national parks, nor accept it as justified that money spent on animals should be, instead, spent on improving lives of human population, but I sincerely believe that this is a matter that needs careful examination of its initiatives and possible consequences before any decision can be made.

　　Human society, to begin with, had long established zoos or national parks for various reasons, some long before they were even called by the name “zoo”. However, zoos are mainly built and kept for two major purposes: public display and conservation of animals.

　　From a psychological perspective, human beings need entertainment, which helps them to either shift their focus and thus temporarily forget their worries or release the built-up energy of stress in a good laugh. A trip to the zoo might just do the work; at least it is more civilized to watch animals roam around and play than watching people fight for lives against ferocious beasts in Roman arena.

　　From an ecological perspective, the environment and the diverse life system it sustains are altogether a delicate equilibrium. Any slight change may wreak unexpected havoc on human lives. It must be, therefore, carefully tended, to which animal species (not just animals but all living things) are essential and must be conserved if we are to preserve the one and only earth for us and our offsprings.

　　Having inspected zoo and its purposes, it is therefore not hard to see that spending money on zoos or national parks for either entertaining purpose or species conservation is improving human lives if not maintaining the current level at least, and therefore must be commended. But any spending on zoos for other than the above mentioned purposes should be denounced as money squandered, and therefore must be stopped in time.

“成千上万人疯狂下载。。。。。。

更多价值连城的绝密英语学习资料，

洛基内部秘密英语，技巧，策略

请在 网上 申请报名”