TPO 16综合写作

Generally, contrary to the belief in the reading that in British around the twentieth century, there are a lot dilemma for the archaeology, the professor asserts that all the three limitations and problems states by the reading below are in fact improve by the government. The professor completely refutes the viewpoint made in the reading passage.

First of all, the writer presents an idea that many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects .In contrast, the professor argues the artifacts are examined by the archaeology then document if it is worthwhile. In order to prove his point, she states that the government has made the rule that before constructing started, it is supposed to examine by the archeology whether the constructions were valuable and interesting. This is just contrary to the belief in the reading.

Besides, the listening material refutes the reading that many archaeologists felt that the financial support for them are inadequate, by saying that the archaeologists are paid by the construct companies for the examining fee. She argues that the funding for the archaeologists is far more than before. This is another part where the speaker casts doubt on the reading.

Finally, the reading states that there were no enough careers for archaeologists to attend. The professor holds a different opinion that the government has set many paid work which was lacked in the past created adequate opportunity for the archeologist to join in. Specifically, the speaker states that the draw of the worthwhile value of the artifacts and the processing of data has created a number of opportunities for the archaeologists to engage in the work. In addition, many great archaeologists have appeared at that time. The two statements are just contradictory to each other.

 

第二篇：TPO综合写作范文16-20

TPO16

The professor explained three aspects of the new guidelines adopted in the United Kingdom, each of which has successfully addressed the problems mentioned in the reading passage concerning the preservation of artifacts, the funding of archaeological research, and career opportunities in archaeology.

First, the professor pointed out that according to the new guidelines, any construction project must undergo an evaluation process in order for the archaeological value of the site to be ascertained. If a site is determined to contain precious objects, a panel of experts is convened to draw up a preservation plan. This measure has proven very effective in addressing the first problem mentioned in the reading – careless and irresponsible construction projects being pursued without any regard for archaeological preservation.

Second, the lecturer explained that the new guidelines shifted the responsibility for funding archaeological work, from initial examination to future preservation, from the government to construction companies. As a result of this shift,

the second problem highlighted in the reading concerning insufficient government funds for archaeological research has been significantly addressed.

The professor’s last point concerned the final problem raised in the reading material – a decline in archaeology-related job opportunities. She argued that thanks to the new guidelines, many skillful, full-time archaeological experts and professionals are now needed to handle work at various stages of archaeological investigation, research, and preservation.

TPO17

The reading passage claims that the number of birds in the IS will definitely decline. Yet the professor argues that bird population will not shrink due to increase in human population, agriculture, and pesticide use as suggested by the author.

First, the professor points out that urban growth, while harmful to some types of birds, could provide habitats for many other types. As a matter of fact, urban and suburban dwellers complain frequently aout too many birds, this , however,

contradicts the statement in the reading that urban development causes birds to disappear.

Second, the professor explains that agricultural develop won’t affect bird population as the reading illustrates. Newly-introduced and highly productive crops continuously contribute to production enhancement and less land use, making it unnecessary for humans to destroy wilderness areas.

Third, while convinced of the harmfulness of pesticide use to birds concluded in the passage, the professor don’t think it will be a problem in the future, in that people are increasingly aware of this problem, and are therefore developing less toxic pesticides and pest resistant crops as solutions.

TPO18

The reading and listening materials have a conflict of opinions about how to preserve Torryea Taxifolia. The writer puts forward three methods to address the problem, which are contradicted by the following lecture.

Firstly, the writer suggests that Torryea can be reestablished in cool and damp microclimate within Florida, while the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle.

According to him, the microclimate is affected by the larger region and can hardly offer the right condition for its growth. Due to global warming and drained wetland, the environment is too dry for Torryea to survive.

Secondly, the author proposes that Torryea can be relocated far from where it currently grows. However, the speaker casts doubt on this proposal by raising the example of black locus tree. When it was moved far north, it spread so quickly and killed out native endangered trees. So assisted migration is ineffective for its unpredicted outcome for other species. The third measure put forward by the writer is to preserve/ develop Torryea in research centers. By contrast, in accordance with the speaker, this method is not going to work out. The reason is that research centers fail to offer enough capacity to hold large and diverse population, which is usually sufficed by natural environment where Torryea can resist diseases. As a result this method is not going to work out.

TPO19

The professor' presentation deals with the issue which is the same as what the reading passage concentrates on. however, he oppositely thinks that the three reasons mentioned in the reading about the negative influence of buzzing on consumer and

society all are unfounded. and he also gives us three reason to support his idea, which makes what the reading dubious. Primarily, even though the reading passage suggest that the buzzers will mislead the consumer by using that consumer does not know they are buzzers, the professor frown on this point. this is because buzzers are those who truly think the product is good. so they will put the misleading information to the consumers.

Further, in the opposition to the statement about the consumers less critically paying attention on the product when buzzers adverting their product, the professor maintains that quite the opposite, the consumer will ask more when a buzzer sells a product. and the professor proves this is true by pointing out the specific question which consumer will ask for buzzers, such as the duration of certain product being used and the price of the product.

Finally, the professor claims that the new tactic buzzing, will not pose threaten for the social relationships, while the reading passage cites this as a powerful reason to reject buzzing. and the professor demonstrates that the process of buzzing is the process that people share a good experience and product, so on the contrary, this will benefit that society.

so the third reason to refuse this new tactic in advertising is also unsustainable.

To sum up, the professor has clearly showed that the central reason using to refuse the buzzing advertising tactic in the reading is untenable.

TPO 20

Though the passage holds that the Let It Burn policy adopted by the massive practices dealing with natural forest fires is too destructive for vegetation, wild life and tourism economy as a whole, the lecture raises opposite evidence to support the policy. According to the lecturer, the wild forest fires cannot only be destructive forces, they are also creative hopes necessary in a complete ecological cycle.

First, for the vegetation, it’s biased for the passage only to focus on the trees and small plants that are burned, charred and blackened in a fire. As shown in the lecture, after the same fire, new plants, especially the small ones can make use of the empty spaces left over and take strong roots there. Other plants whose seeds need strong heat to develop would also benefit from the burning and then thrive in the new environment. Second, the exaggerated stress in the passage on dead wild life is neither proper. When some species can experience a

disaster in the fire, other species can take the niche and fit in well. So the lecturer believes the overall habitat for living creatures just changes after a fire; and the thriving of small animals like rabbit and hare can bring along the prosperity of their predators, thus forging a new stronger food chain. Third, the tourism economy in the natural parks won’t be ruined as the passage assumes. The lecturer points to the fact that wild fire of the same scale as the 1988 one is quite rare in history. Their scarce visit to the landscape may interfere with the tourism industry for one year or two, but they never stand as a long term threat to the local economy.