<<教导型组织>>读后感

王永远

最近初略读了教导型组织理论创立者侯志奎先生的《教导型组织》一书。书中全面阐述了“教导型组织”的理论；同时也结合中国本土企业特点，具有“招招点穴、刀刀见血”的实战性，是一本构建优秀“教导型企业”的教课书；是一本管理者修炼成为“教导型企业家”的启智之书。可谓言简意赅，通俗易懂，又切中要害。

作者从对军队、学校和家庭的研究分析，揭开世界三大顶尖组织——军队、学校和家庭的秘密，汲取了世界上有史以来所有顶尖组织的管理精华，再结合博大精深的东方文化、中国智慧和自己的实践应用，教给我们如何构建一个顶尖组织的方法。

教导型组织就是树立以客户价值为导向的事业理念，制定超越和颠覆竞争对手的竞争战略，培养与战略匹配的核心能力，构建以能力为导向的教育培训体系，并保持持续学习、不断推动企业持续发展、基业长青的卓越组织。具有以下六大典型特征：

（1）以客户价值为导向。

（2）树立集体意识。

（3）建立独特的战略定位。

（4）打造与战略匹配的盈利能力。

（5）搭建以能力为导向的教育体系。

（6）保持持续循环和精进。

在新的时代，我们的经济也从资本经济时代逐步跨入品牌经济时代，这个时代的核心不再是资源，不再是资本，而是人。时代会呵护符合时代精神的企业，摒弃那些没有社会责任感的企业。教导型企业，一定有着更为远大的追求，区别于普通企业的标准是创造社会价值、让员工安居乐业、企业受人尊敬和实现人生价值。

组织的核心不是机器，不是金钱，而是人。所以组织要以人为本，要从人性来透视组织管理。组织管理，就是要让成员充满力量，发掘成员的原动力。所以，一个组织如果不能挖掘出员工的爱与信仰的动力，不能培养本能，组织就很难成功。当组织的吸引力和组织的原动力对接，组织的驱动力最大、马力最足时，组织就会无往而不胜的。

几点感受：

一、“一个组织是以做生意为理念为导向，还是以做事业为导向，决定了这家公司是卓越还是优秀的。”对于这一点，我深有体会，当你只用物质去激励一个人的时候，那是一种低层次、操作层面的刺激；假如你只偏向于物质利益，那可能只是一般的劳动力。当一个人能够将精神和物质激励结合起来，可能会非常卓越。

二、“要在竞争中立于不败之地，就要找到自己的核心竞争力”。这一点，体现在我们企业中的是经常盲目地效仿；资源有限且分散，什么都兼顾，却做得马马虎虎。要将自己的竞争模式与对手的竞争模式区隔开来；然后建立以核心价值为中心的单要素竞争策略，在有限的资源条件下将竞争战略有效落地。

三、“与一流的创意、三流的执行比起来，我宁可选择三流的创意、一流的执行”。组织有了精准的战略，还必须有能力去实现自己的战略。企业呈现的很多问题，比如质量问题、效率低下等都是表象，核心原因是管理者对组织的整个运作过程不清晰。只有持续地完善能力，搭建系统并完善，才能做大做强。

四、 “如果没有学习的基因，公司是不可能持续发展的”优秀的公司都有自己的培训与学习体系。要保持持续的创新能力，就必须保持持续的学习力。通过学习中实践、实践中学习，融战略和核心理念于日常学习体系中，从而实现战略和核心理念的落地。

五、传统的领导方式大多采取权威式领导，领导决定所有的政策、计划并给出具体的方法，并要求下属不折不扣的依从。而教导型组织的领导者主要采用参与式的管理方法，生活中有关爱，管理中有互动，既不是一个人说了算，也不是放任员工自由发挥，而是大家都“唯理是从”，鼓励员工的创造性思维，但要约束员工的行为规范。

尽管教导型组织的前景十分迷人，但如果把他视为一贴万灵药则是危险的。事实上，教导型组织的缔造不应是最终目的，重要的是通过迈向教导型组织的种种努力，引导一种不断创新、不断进步的新观念，从而使组织日新月异，不断创造未来。要像家庭一样充满爱，保持超强的凝聚力；要像学校一样，永恒不断地反省和学习，保持组织的生命活力；要像军队一样，严明纪律，保持超强的执行力。

总之，创建教导型企业是一个漫长的、艰苦的过程，必须结合企业的实际情况，不断探索、不断总结，以期建立起具有自身鲜明特色的教导型组织，真正促进企业的长远发展。

 

第二篇：蝇王读后感

My Appreciation of Lord of the Flies

Introduction

Lord of the Flies tells the story of a group of English boys deserted on a tropical island after their plane is shot down during a war.

My Own View on This Novel

First and foremost, as far as I am concerned, in exploring the breakdown into savagery of a group of boys free from the imposed moral constraints of civilization and society, Lord of the Flies dramatizes a fundamental human struggle: the conflict between the impulse to behave morally and the impulse to indulge in violence. The first set of impulses might be thought of as the “civilizing instinct”, which encourages people to work together toward common goals and behave peacefully; the second set of impulses might be thought of as the “barbarizing instinct”, or the instinct toward savagery, which urges people to rebel against civilization and instead seek anarchy, chaos, despotism, and violence.

What is more, I will present my opinion about the two main characters: Ralph and Jack.

Ralph is the athletic, charismatic protagonist of Lord of the 1

Flies. Elected the leader of the boys at the beginning of the novel, Ralph is the primary representative of order, civilization, and productive leadership in the novel. Ralph’s power and influence over the other boys are extremely secure at first. However, as the book progresses and the group succumbs to savage instincts, Ralph’s position declines precipitously as Jack’s station rises. Ralph’s commitment to civilization and morality is strong, and his main wish is to be rescued and returned to the society of adults. For much of the novel, Ralph is simply unable to understand why the other boys would give in to base instincts of bloodlust and barbarism. The sight of the hunters chanting and dancing is baffling and distasteful to him.

Jack, the strong-willed, egomaniacal boy who is the novel’s prime representative of the instinct of savagery, violence, and power, is the antithesis of Ralph. From the beginning of the novel, Jack desires power above all other things. The first time he encounters a pig, he is unable to kill it. But Jack soon becomes obsessed with hunting and devotes himself to the task, painting his face like a barbarian and giving himself over to bloodlust. The more savage Jack becomes, the more he is able to control the rest of the group. By the end of the novel, Jack has learned to use the boys’ fear of the beast to control their behavior, giving Golding a chance to explore 2

how religion and superstition can be used as instruments of power. Jack’s love of authority and violence are intimately connected, as each enables him to feel powerful and exalted.

Furthermore, I will tell you two themes I have found in this novel.

The important theme of the novel is the conflict between two competing impulses that exist within all human beings: the instinct to live by rules and to value the good of the group on the one hand; and the instinct to gratify one’s immediate desires, to act violently to obtain supremacy over others, and to enforce one’s will on the other hand. The conflict might also be expressed as order vs. chaos, reason vs. impulse, law vs. anarchy, or in any number of other ways, including the more generalized good vs. evil. Throughout the novel, the instinct of civilization is associated with goodness, while the instinct of savagery is associated with evil. Generally, the novel portrays the instinct of savagery as far more primal and fundamental to the human psyche than the instinct of civilization. Moral behavior, in Golding’s view, is often merely a forced imposition of civilization, rather than a natural expression of human individuality. When left to their own devices, the novel seems to argue, people will become cruel, wild, and barbaric. This idea of innate human evil is central to Lord of the Flies.

3

Another theme is loss of innocence. As the boys on the island progress from well-behaved, orderly children who hope to be researched to cruel, bloodthirsty hunters who have no desire to return to civilization, they naturally lose the sense of innocence that they possessed at the beginning of the novel. The painted savages in Chapter 12 who have hunted, tortured, and killed animals and human beings are a far cry from the simple children swimming in the lagoon in Chapter 3.But Golding does not portray this loss of innocence as something that is done to the children; rather, it results naturally from their increasing contact with the innate evil and savagery within themselves.

Last but not least, I also find out plenty of symbols from this novel. The conch shell is the first important discovery Piggy and Ralph make on the island, and they use it to summon the boys together after they are separated by the crash. As a result, it becomes a powerful symbol of civilization and order. The signal fire burns on the mountain, and later on the beach, to attract the notice of passing ships that might be able to rescue the boys. So it becomes a symbol for the boy’s connection to civilization. The beast, which frightens all the boys, stands for the primary instinct of savagery that exists within all human beings. Piggy is the most intelligent, rational boy in the group, and his glasses represent the power of science and 4

intellectual endeavor in society.

Conclusion

As people always could not face their own evil, so they made the tragedy happen again and again. The boys’ awareness of modern democracy in the cultivation of civil society has undergone a process of rapid decline of time. Its root lies in the degeneration of human nature and the separation of rational judgments and moral conscience.

5