书评

原文作者 艾玛1006=韩小兔

寒假初 油画未至 无所事事

平时上网看看美剧间歇，接着看明朝那些事儿

近几年有营养又精彩使得贫尼爱不释手的书太少 这部绝对是 尽管学了四年英语还八级了，坦白说贫尼还是一如既往的爱着文史 天朝文化，博大精深值得探寻

这些年史料不少看，这个太特别了，引用一段经典评价，文章以通俗小说的方式，瑞士表匠的耐心，德国制造工人的严谨，法国酿酒师的情怀，美国喜剧演员的幽默，完整的明史，严谨不失幽默，可为明史普及读物，可为居家旅行学习阅读，无事消遣之首选。

有一天进入教材也许是奢望，但他所体现的史观绝对值得称道 精准客观公正，针对历史人物的评论处颇有见地，史官只怕也要汗颜，网络文学成名者众，名副其实者寡，包括玄幻成名的诸家，看胡说八道的文字，看多了真心头疼。

偶尔看见这样的写历史的书，文风洒脱，而内容严谨 当时就看进去了

然后发现很多历史人物的在印象里的多年固有形象都颠覆了，这些形象常年活跃在古装电视剧市场，比如说海瑞，比如说袁崇焕，比如钱谦益，比如洪承畴和范文程。 电视剧里呈现出的形象就是海瑞是包拯似的人物，而袁崇焕是岳飞似的英雄，尤其是作为比较铁杆儿的金庸粉，一直觉得碧血剑里袁承志他爹死的憋屈，怒斥“诸臣误我”的崇祯帝是个昏君，吴三桂是个汉奸，闯王李自成是个草蜢英雄

然后猛然发现电视剧里形象和真实的历史角色，大相径庭

而后人对历史最大的尊重，应该是还原它原本的面目，即便它更为不堪，即便它与固有的印象相去甚远，但是它真实

以前琢磨清史的时候差点被一位大忽悠带沟里去，这位是一度混迹在百家讲坛的红学砖家，名叫刘心武，用他所谓的探轶的角度破解红楼梦，还把它拐进清史这个大坑里去了，刚开始觉得新颖，跟着跟着就觉得简直是离谱，小说家要凭借你天马行空的想象力怎么编排红楼梦是你的自由，但是清史这边水太深，你个儿不够，就别跟着凑热闹啦

有关崇祯皇帝，他死不瞑目，死前愤恨的怒斥，诸臣误我！这是实话，据说流寇攻入京城之时文武百官吓得屁滚尿流，直接开门放人，浑不知羞耻怎么写，更不知“气节”为何物，崇祯皇帝，坑你的岂止是“文官人人该死”的诸臣，坑你最猛的是你亲爹啊，人说明亡于天启，更有说明亡于万历，这个不服众，因为万历早期有天才人臣张居正，所以明当亡于天启，因为天启，明明是个木匠，还是个半文盲，非得干皇帝的活儿，结果蹦出来出了个超级坏蛋魏忠贤，搅得天下乌烟瘴气，损了元气。

按照当年明月的说法，明朝亡于“气数”，算是客观理由，觉得存在了两百多年的明朝，是到活到岁数了，好吧

当时内忧外患，最终推到了这座大厦，内损根基，偏又外族来袭。内损根基指的不是崇祯无道，而是天启年，乱臣当朝，崇祯皇帝上台费劲巴力的肃清朝野刚想有所作为，结果，西北，就是山西山西甘肃一带，年年闹灾荒，天灾终于导致人祸，于是盗寇四处作乱，朝廷于是出将出钱平乱，与此同时，东北，辽东以北，逐渐发展起来的后金，一直蠢蠢欲动，准备好了就动手，那么明朝有没有能臣武将，有，但是毕竟有限，挡不住内外夹击，能独当一面的武将死绝了，大明也就亡了。

专家们叹气，要是当时敌人只有后金，或者只有流寇，不至于亡国，所以最终使得外族得以入主中原的罪首，便是高迎祥李自成这些无知的流寇，让李自成当皇帝，他当得了么，历史的真相明白的放在那儿，他就是个强盗，和外族人夹击，毁灭了国家的罪人

东北，有天才军事家孙承宗，构筑一道铁壁铜墙关宁防线，训练出一支无敌的关宁铁骑，后金能挡得住么？挡得住，对，你没看错，是军事家孙承宗，不是袁崇焕。袁崇焕将军干的那些事儿，比如连个正当的理由都拿不出来，就擅自杀害牵制后金多年的毛文龙，放任后金大部队进入京城。瓜田李下，换你是崇祯皇帝你也得起疑心，就是不杀了，这人也不能使劲儿用了，别的不说，就单单草菅人命，就是个要命的恶习。

关于范文程，以前的印象就是皇太极身边出谋划策汉人，影视剧里面至始至终的正面形象，因为是在以霸屏的满清辫子戏里面，后金是主角，范大参谋怎么会是坏人呢，可是放进历史的大背景里，他不就是主动投敌出谋划策的汉奸么，吴三桂被骂了这么多年，好歹还有个“冲冠一怒为红颜”的幌子在那儿放着呢，范先生可连个借口也没有啊，汉奸。洪承畴，不管清史里面说什么庄妃劝降啊，识时务者啊，都是废话，你死了是为国捐躯，你活着就是说明你贪生怕死，没有节操，没有气节，也汉奸

钱谦益，知道钱谦益是因为，他是柳如是的归宿，柳如是是谁？秦淮八艳里面最美眼光的美人，如是,不是 出自“我见青山多妩媚料青山见我应如是 ”，而出自 “如是我闻 ”一株梨花压海棠，虽然觉得对话有爱，“夫君爱我什么 ？白肤黑发，夫人爱我什么？ 白发黑肤” 但这对老夫少妻 单爱柳如是，厌恶钱谦益。以前觉得钱谦益是文化界老色鬼，现在觉得徒有虚名的虚伪的老色鬼。

下面咱谈谈节操，这点在明末，巾帼不让须眉

为什么爱柳如是？因为她爱国，这点和她的好姐妹李香君比有过之而无不及，清军打进来了，有节操的柳如是拉着钱谦益跳河殉国，不料这孙子脚刚伸出去就收回来了来了句 水凉。我不知道当时柳如是啥表情，就应该一脚踹水里去。钱谦益还是投降了，去北京干了半年辞官回南京了 因为有人鼓动他这么干的，谁鼓动的？柳如是，她说你怎么能因为一时的前程，毁了一世英名。柳如是还鼓动他联合郑成功等造反，钱谦益没干，换做我，我也不干，因为没必要，都六七十岁的大爷了，消停点儿，安享晚年罢

明末的江南，曾有秦淮八艳，里面最为出名的莫过于李香君，因为那部孔尚任先生的《桃花扇》

南洪北孔，洪就是《长生殿》的作者洪升，有考证表明他才是红楼梦的真正作者，长生殿是啥？古代的剧本，讲的主要是杨玉环和唐玄宗的爱情故事。当中最出名的句子就是语文教材里面都会出现的名句，“七月七日长生殿，夜半无人私语时，在天愿作比翼鸟，在地愿为连理枝”

北孔就是孔尚任，桃花扇的作者，桃花扇的主角正是八艳中的李香君，之所以有名不因其貌美多才，因为她爱国，明大义、辨是非，不阿附权贵，有气节至少比她的情人强，桃花扇的男主侯方域

除了李香君最有名的就是陈圆圆，有人说她比李更有名，吴三桂还因为李自成抢了她，一怒之下投降清朝，历史上赫赫有名的几大红颜祸水之一和苏妲己妹喜褒姒齐名，还有人专做《圆圆曲》以表彰她的无量功德，作诗的这个人叫吴梅村，诗中有名句“恸哭六军俱缟素，冲冠一怒为红颜。”有这句之后，陈圆圆是彻底红了

私以为，陈圆圆是躺着也中枪，觉得这根本就是一个政治立场不坚定的男人，为了转移骂名的可耻行径，真是个可耻的汉奸。

还有比较有名的是董小宛，这里还有个迷雾，就是好些人把她和顺治皇帝的妃

子董鄂妃混淆了，所以你细心点儿会发现古装剧里各种董鄂妃的名字里面都有个宛，宛如，婉宁什么的，真相是，她和董鄂妃没啥关系，这个才貌双全的女人后来嫁为人妾侍，那个人是文人冒襄，董小宛非常聪明，不仅色艺双绝，还位列我国古代十大名厨，因为太贤惠，像个丫鬟伺候男人全家，是活活累死的，所以女人也不能太贤惠。

李香君的情人叫侯方域，和前面提到的冒襄，加上方以智 陈贞慧 时人称四公子 复社成员 复社又是啥啊？明末清初，政治色彩浓厚的文学社的大联合，自称东林党的后继者，分几个阶段，明末时期讽时事，因倡气节，清初时期多归隐。包括坚持武装抗清的，柳如是的初恋陈子龙，提倡学以致用的大腕明星黄宗羲都是复社成员

 

第二篇：英语书评怎么写

1．一个生动的开场白：用一两个简短的段落揭示作者的姓名、书名，以及有关作者的简要信息，如过去的作品、曾获得的荣誉。

2．如果是小说，对情节做简要勾勒，如果作品不是小说，写明写作目的和主题。

3．书评作者对此书优缺点的评论。

4．用一个总结性的语句式段落使读者对此书有一个总体印象。 开篇

写好开篇段落对书评来说非常有挑战性，其目的是抓住读者的注意力，使他们产生读这篇文章的热切愿望。

开篇之前，先做一下笔记，问自己一些问题：

·贯穿此书的主题是什么？

·与同类书相比，这本书的特色是什么？

·这本书对我产生了什么影响？通过回答上述问题，你可能就知道该如何人手了。

一般来说，作者姓名和书名应该在第一段中出现，但有时你可能会从书中最重要的观点说起，犹如书评专门评论该书的主题。文章开头用简短的语言表明作者对本书的总体印象是个不错的办法，一两个形容词就够了，过后你可在此基础上扩展。

摘要

人们是为了判断是否想读这本书才去看书评的，因此你应让他们对书的内容有所了解。小说的评论可对主要人物作些介绍，但只需简要点出部分情节即可。没有比评论者泄露了小说结局更让作者和准读者更恼火的事了！通常我简介小说的前三分之一或前半部分情节，忽略副情节。在冲突即将解决时，某个人物要做出决定时，或一个主要的活动场景即将开始时，戛然而止。

非小说的书评则应提供所有重要信息的概览，其中包括重大的日期，人物地点，观点及作者如何得出结论的阐述。

适当地引用书中原文可使读者产生真实的感受。要寻找那些机智、动人或有力的话语，并对它们产生的背景作一番描述。除非编辑准许你篇幅拉长，一般情况下，一定要将引言限制在一两句之内。不要忘记在每句引文后面注上页码出处，这样编辑可以核实。

总结

使用有力度的词语，尽量简短地总结你对此书的观点。如果可能，与篇首的评论遥相呼应

范文：

On Jane Eyre

Reading Jane Eyre is a process full of pleasure and motivation. The heroine, Jane Eyre, succeeds in conquering millions of readers by her virtue, consistence and reason. To make Jane’s extraordinary romance with Mr.Rochester a break from routine, Charlotte Bronte managers to connect Jane with an “ordinary” aspirant and Mr.Rochester a disability.

The essence of love deserves a discussion and reflection here. Appearance? possession? To me, neither. Miss Ingram, undoubtedly, a wealthy, pretty and accomplished lady from the first class, is described by Mr.Rochester as one of those “women who please me only by their faces. They open to

me a perspective of flatness, triviality and perhaps imbecility,

coarseness, and ill-temper. ”In addition, the repeated proposal of the handsome, ambitious St.John comes across Jane’s stable refusal. These plots are expected to get out of a conventional stereotype that appearance and possession count most. In Jane Eyre, love is only based on internal appreciation. It is Jane’s virtue that brings light to all around her---kinship, friendship and romance.

To my regret, virtue no longer shares the priority and popularity in our modern society. More or less, people have been accustomed to making external show pass for clean shrines. Sometimes, people feel reluctant to admit their poverty and ugliness. However, those who dares to

scrutinize and expose---to raise the gilding , and show basic metal under it, are too often neglected. For the people that merely care fa?ade brilliance, I suppose, Jane Eyre cannot be missed.

Apart from Jane, I want to mention Helen Burns, a most important friend of Jane. Though the author doesn’t emphasis her, I do appreciate this little girl and feel sorry for her early death. Tender but firm, learned but modest, eloquent but prorious, Helen Burns always remains obedient to critism, smiles at her friend when most needed and difficult, keeps calm towards death. Really, I believe she has a heart large enough, vigorous enough to hold her swelling life of pure and fervid. Her spirit seemed hastening to live with a very brief span as much as many people during a protracted existence.

Besides depicting a typically stable, tractable Jane, Jane Eyrealso stands out for some other aspects. Given the content, the book discovers many social problems that period had, such as the poor charitable school, hypocritical postors and profligate nobles; Given the rhetorical feature, it is not only a work of realism, but also full of romantic atmosphere. The mixture of presentiment, symbolism, synecdoche and metaphor contributes a lot to literature value. Obviously, the author’s

description towards Jane’s mentality differs a lot from the former ones. It is more forthright and minute.

On the whole, Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre is a profound work that reminds readers of a theme: Virtue and Persistence. It has inspired so many readers especially females to struggle for a better life. Jane, a lady endowed with independence and goodness, is really a symbol of feminism. Critics say it is Charlotte Bronte that accomplishes Jane Eyre. For me, it is Jane Eyre that accomplishes Charlotte Bronte.

<<傲慢与偏见>>的英文书评

Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant.) Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.

The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.

The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in possession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession. People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.

I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughters. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.

In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy

husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married. In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?

Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.