《野性的呼唤》读后感

热望本已在，蓬勃脱尘埃：沉沉长眠后，野性重归来。

野性，在这个人类的文明社会，这个词似乎是不被允许存在的。它意味着落后、退化、低等和粗鄙。野性的呼唤，呼唤的是野性，是在文明社会中隐藏的原始生存本能。《野性的呼唤》讲述的就是一个生命抛弃文明，奔向野性的故事。 “风俗的链条锁不住游牧部落跳跃的古老渴望；寒冬萧条，沉沉睡去，野性将唤醒凄厉的诗行。” 《野性的呼唤》又名《荒野的呼唤》，美国著名作家杰克?伦敦所著。整篇小说讲述的是一只叫巴克的狗的悲惨而令人激动的经历以及它逐渐回归到自己原始野性状态的故事。而作者并没有将它的遭遇讲得如何惊险离奇，只是将它摆在一个多样的狗的群体中。在那个群体中它品尝到了真正的狗的生活，而作者适时地在其中插入了巴克内心的野性的逐步复苏，直到爆发。 巴克从小生活在南方一个法官的家里，在那儿巴克享受着优裕的生活，同时很受尊重，可一切却因人类在北方找到一种黄色的金属而改变。带有几分贵族气质的巴克遭受了不礼貌的待遇，它被法官的园丁拐走，卖到一个穿红绒线衫家伙那儿。接着是一顿大棒的反复猛打，一次再次地打得它昏死过去。巴克最初被卖给两个法裔加拿大人，后来辗转卖给邮局，又被送到阿拉斯加严寒地区去拉运送邮件的雪橇。在极度恶劣的环境下，巴克努力地适应着陌生的环境，并不断的从同伴那儿摸索到了许许多多的生存之道。这里我要提一只狗斯匹茨， 因为从它身上，巴克“学”到了很多，让在朦胧中的巴克记起了原始的杀戮。斯匹茨是雪橇队里的排头狗，也就是领袖。它把巴克当成是潜在的对手，总是挑衅找茬，表面和善，实际凶残。起先，对于斯匹茨巴克总是处处忍让，尽量避免发生正面冲突。一方面他从中学习，另一方面体内的本能随着一次次的挑衅复活了。最终祖先们的咬啮、撕扯和豺狼式的突击在巴克的身上活跃起来，它把斯匹茨斗倒了，成为了狗群的领队狗。一旦野性苏醒，那来自森林深处的呼喊便时时诱惑着巴克，那是一种凄凉怪诞、叫人毛骨悚然的调子，可巴克却很高兴跟着一起嚎。巴克先后换过几个主人，最后被约翰?索顿收留。那是在巴克被残暴的主人哈尔打得遍体鳞伤、奄奄一息时，索顿救了他，并悉心为他疗伤。在索顿的精心护理下巴克恢复得很快，由此他们之间产生了真挚的感情。巴克对索顿非常忠诚。不幸的是，

在淘金的过程中，索顿被印第安人杀死。狂怒之下，巴克咬死了几个印第安人，为主人报了仇，从此它觉得对这个人类社会已无所留恋。在巴克与这些磨难抗争时，来自荒野的隐秘呼唤一直回荡在它脑中，并一步步将它带回了野性的世界。原始动物的强悍习性在它身上越发强烈，在一次捕猎中，巴克尝到了那种嗜血的欲望和因杀戮而获得的快乐，最终走进荒野，成为了狼王。

《野性的呼唤》中，作者特别注重想象和幻觉的描写，我们不难从中发现作者透露出的浪漫主义情结。首先，作者把狗作为写作对象，就体现了作者丰富的浪漫主义情怀。其次，标题“野性的呼唤”非常的抒情，给人无尽的想象。文中对荒野的描写如“北极光冷冷的在头顶上照耀着，有时繁星在舞蹈中跳动，而大地在冰雪覆盖之下在严寒下麻木了和冻结了。”等等，抒情风格浓郁，语言非常优美。但是，书中所体现的浪漫主义并非一般意义上的直抒胸臆，而是同现实主义相结合的。巴克骨子里充满狼性，坚忍不拔，富有强烈的抗争精神，是达尔文“适者生存”论中所谓的强者。而这也是由巴克生而就具有的性格所决定的。小说的一开始就说到，巴克是“王”，骨子里充满狼性，坚忍不拔，富有强烈的抗争精神。现实的残酷性逼得巴克更加地勇猛剽悍，阴险狡诈，但同时却又对恩人万分感激，在它身上集中了现实生活中的各种矛盾。

《野性的呼唤》影响我最大的，是它包含的生存和生命的启示。

首先，棍棒法则。在无情的棍棒下，高贵的巴克被打得头昏脑胀，毫无反抗的余地。在这里，我们可以看到马克思主义对作者的影响：无产者受到残酷的剥削和沉重的压迫，而维护这种剥削压迫的，则是棍棒－－社会权利机构。巴克在棍棒下明白了一个道理:在那拿着大棒的人面前是没有希望的。“棍棒法则”教会了它如何服从，巴克选择了承认失败但不垮下。在残酷的社会法则里，服从是安身立命的最佳选择，但并不意味着成为制度的行尸走肉，我们还应对这个制度保持清醒的认识，服从、防范，为反抗保留力量。

适者生存。在那个残酷的环境中，不够坚强、不够智慧、甚至不够奸诈阴险，都无法存活下去。荒野没有和平，生命和肉体随时随刻都处在危险之中。在这样的地理环境中，任何为生存而进行努力的手段和行为都是合乎情理的，斯文、高洁、谦让这些文明社会所赞扬的美德则都是弱者的表现。养尊处优的巴克学会了在极寒的雪地里挖坑避寒，通过偷窃获得让自己生存下去的食物，用力量和奸诈

使自己成为最强大的存在而保护自己不被伤害??周围的环境一直逼迫着巴克，而巴克也在努力地让自己适应着环境，并成为个中翘楚，对抗着严峻的生存挑战。物竞天择，适者生存，无论在哪里，都是永恒不变的真理。在杰克?伦敦的作品中，伴随死亡而来的不是眼泪，乞求，而是尊严；死亡也不是阴森森的，而是冷静、清醒的。这种意识主要表现在抗拒死亡的威胁、寻求有尊严的死亡、遵循死亡的自然规律等方面，这也正是他热爱生命，礼赞生命的独特方式。《野性的呼唤》中那些雪橇狗寻求死亡的方式（非常有尊严且高贵）以及巴克最终选择了荒野而不是被异化的人类文明社会，表明了这一点。正是因为有着强烈的而清醒的死亡意识，所以他笔下的主人公对生命有着出自本能的热爱，对死亡有着源自本能的反抗。其实对死亡的恐惧，对死亡的抗争，从另一个角度讲也是对生命的热爱。而只有意识到人类作为生命个体的存在终有一天要被死亡终结这一悲剧性的事实，人们才会倍加珍惜和热爱生命过程中的每一个瞬间。

由此，我想到了我们的生存和竞争教育。巴克最后选择了荒野，成为了狼群中的王者，意味着他抛弃了虚假的人类文明，而走上了最原始最直接也是最本质的野性社会。在那里，它不需要套上圣洁文明的枷锁生活，只需要面对最简单的生活挑战。这是巴克的选择，也是一个强者的选择。试看现今的人类社会，生存竞争仍是所有人所需要面对的挑战。懦弱、圣洁、友善，早已在这个金钱地位至上的竞争社会成为了一种虚伪的武器。那么，我们的孩子，应该让他们成为羊还是成为狼呢？

我倡导，狼的教育。野性，从某种角度来说就是灵魂最深处的本能。而人类最强烈的本能体现，就是让自己生存下去。人类所创造的文明社会，能保护弱者不被激烈的竞争所淘汰，但是要想让自己有限的生命达到最精彩的高度，则需要原始的野性来适应激烈的竞争，让自己成为生存的强者，成为社会的竞争的强者。

 

第二篇：野性的呼唤读后感

My Call of the Wild

------ Enlightenment of The Call of the Wild

" He sings a song of the younger world, which is the song of the pack." (Chapter VII The Sounding of the Wild) When the last sentence vanished from my eyes, I can still perceive an echo of a song - a wild song, which

knocks up my dizzy mind that always cheerfully sink into the so-called civilized world without questioning. Wild, is no longer a symbol of the law of jungle but a headspring where streams out love, passion, bravery, loyalty,

friendship, venture, competition and tolerance all these virtues can easily be found in the Call of the Wild.

Jack London (1876-1916) is a worldwide renowned novelist. His stories successfully reflect the contradictory views of man’s nature and destiny in and against the wild, and his "fight to survive" notion has gained him and his works timeless popularity, particularly, the Call of the Wild.

It tells a story of a gigantic dog, named Buck, who is stolen from a rich and comfortable home and forced to learn to survive as an Alaskan sled dog. Buck, at first, is too savage for the company of man until he coincidently encounters his beloved master-kindhearted John Thornton. Finally, John’s incidental death breaks Buck’s last tie to the man and drives him into his long-desired wild with his pack. In the story, Buck and John simply adopt themselves to answer the call of the wild. When it comes to Buck’s mind that one day he will eventually leave John- his master, all he wants to do is just to help him finish the gold-rush-trip. He " from then on, night and day, never put a halt, in desperation, he burst into long stretch of flight, did not to stay him (John)…" (Chapter VII The Sounding of The Wild) Buck wished to remember John’s image forever, he "for two days and nights never left camp, never let Thornton out of his sight. He followed him about at his work, watched him while saw him into blankets at night and out of them in the morning…" (Chapter VII) When I read these words I just could not hold my tears bursting. Can a real man devote himself to loyalty and friendship in such a way? On the other hand, John Thornton is not only a dog-lover but also a brave and venturous man. He is so straightforward and simple that makes him an accommodating man. Once he firmly roots a goal into his heart, it seems that nothing could prevent him from accomplishing it except death. I do not know whether the persistence is the most vital element to make a man successful, but what I know is that you are not far away from success once you occupy it.

It is Jack London who plunges me into the animated wild from the hustle-and-bustle and from desperate city. There, I merely cannot deny the attraction of Buck’s bark, which enlightens me to pursue another lost half of the nature in mankind, and to dig out a true meaning of life. Dare we imagine that

London intentionally employs Buck to set us a model with perfect

characters (count barbarity out)? The answer is affirmed. We, as animals, are from the wild but shedding off more and more wild signs, which demonstrate us as the "uncivilized". However, who can fully guarantee that we have not overlooked some essential wild-endowed virtues? Especially, nowadays, it seems more crucial for us to stop looking at the post-industrialized world and to ponder for a while. When cheats, betrayals, lies, lusts and crimes stuff a materialized society, whether London uses this novel to help himself escape the reality or warn the earthy people, to us, modern man, is all the same. It

appears horrible that in modern society many people are enthusiastically talking about how to build up "special relations" to the authority, deceiving and lying to each other. To them life is a mask-wearing process rather than a hard work. Every time, you browse WebPages, scandals in politics, business, the entertainment circle and even on campus crowd into your eyes. Oh, what is the essence of human beings? What is the civilization to us? Do we need to look back at where we came from? Is it good or bad for us to speak out what we think and to do what the consciences demand us to? Are we wasting talents given by the mighty nature? Be an honest, straightforward, warmhearted, emotional and responsible man or be a shrewd, cold hearted and astute hypocrite? While embracing the "civilized" rubbish, we are losing those good virtues, which are the calls of the wild. Once we lose them, we are to lose ourselves, and we will get nowhere. I wish this dreadful thought is totally a fallacy, but, now, it is chilling me hard. One day when I happen to stand on the top of a grand mountain to observe a boundless prairie enveloped by the sapphire firmament and combed by gusts of the rhythmical west wind, a morning sun sprinkles me her warmth and brilliance in a graceful way, however, at that moment, I am afraid that I cannot appreciate these beauties, I am a lost " civilized man" then.

Please, please do not let come true while we are still able to answer the call of the wild.