辩论总结

One child policy Last week, we have a debate on one child policy. We are a total of 15 people to talk about this topic and I was a member of the opposition. The one child policy was promulgated in 1979, after the social disruptions and economic stagnation of the Cultural Revolution. This policy limits family size, encourages late marriage and childbearing, and the spacing of children when second children are permitted.

In many other areas, something more like a two-child policy has been emerging. Rural residents are usually allowed to have a second if the first is a girl (typically after a gap of four years). Ethnic minorities can have more. Many places have started allowing parents who themselves lack siblings to have two offspring. A senior family-planning official said in 20xx that in effect the one-child policy applied to less than 40% of the population.

It is not an all-encompassing rule because it has always been restricted to ethnic Han Chinese living in urban areas. Citizens living in rural areas and minorities living in China are not subject to the law. This rule has caused a disdain for female infants; abortion, neglect, abandonment, and even infanticide have been known to occur to female infants. The result of such Draconian family planning has resulted in the disparate ratio of 114 males for every 100 females among babies from birth through children four years of age. Normally, 105 males are naturally born for every 100 females.

As is known to us all , china is a large country with intense population , and it increases by a large percent with years . Since the resources and environmental bearing capacity are limited , it’s a great burden to our earth with this huge number of people . In this emergency , “One child policy” came out and was put into practice ever since as an national policy .

In general , one child policy , to some extent , contributes a lot to control the increase of the population . One child policy , according to the literal meaning , it means that a family only can have one child . Thus lowing down the speed of the growing .

What’s more , it’s positive to lessen the pressure on the resources and environment . As for our human beings , we need space to live and require all kinds of resources to maintain our daily lives . Therefore , less people means less lay-out on resources and less strain on the surroundings .

Finally , it’s beneficial for us to improve our standard of living and education . Since every family is allowed to own one child , they will try their best to offer the only child the best educational and living conditions . In addition , family’s living qualities will comparatively be improved because they only need to look after one child .

To sum up , “One child policy” really makes a big difference , but it also exists defects . only by raising our people’s awareness and inner qualities can we set foot on the way to the success .

 

第二篇:辩论总结

激情澎湃的辩论赛

激情永职的天空,像海洋一样广阔;我们的生活,像浪花一样美丽。曾几何时,我们的青春高高升作猎猎风帆;曾几何时,我们搏击风浪的自信飞扬在宏阔的蓝天下。于是一场激烈的辩论赛使我们的风采充分展现。11月x日,在这充满竞争,漫溢青春朝气以分会为单位的辩论大舞台,双方机会均等,但能力各有千秋,阐述的理由也各有特色。从我们社团的角度来看,活动总体是成功的,但也有不足之出,现总结如下

1、成功之处:

目的明确。为搞好团活动,丰富同学们的课外生活,增进社团会员之间的友谊,使同学们有更加积极的姿态而开展。

准备充分。我们社团提前有策划方案,有合理部署,材料准备充足,思路清晰。

组织合理。四位辩手能够密切配合,合理发挥,各司其职,分工合作相互进行。

效果明显。各位辩手锻炼和发挥了自己的口才,同学们也积极参与,现场氛围紧张热烈又不失欢快。

影响广泛。双方增进了友谊,团队之间增强了集体观念,同时也为社团活动的开展指出了新的方向,也为下次同类型的活动开展打下了坚实的基础。

2、不足方面:

(1)、理论准备不足。我没有在理论方面充分搜集材料,辩论也

没有在理论层面进行较量;

(2)、语言表达有所欠缺。引经据典方面明显有缺陷,有个别辩手紧张造成表达不很流畅;

(3)、没有充分展开主题。一方面是时间所致,另一方面是没有一针见血指出要害;

(4)、现场纪律有混乱现象。个别同学有喧哗吵闹的现象在局部影响了现场秩序;

(5)、同学参与热情不是很高。提问问题人数少,也没有和辩手充分内外配合。

“前事不忘,后事之师”,尽管活动已经结束,但我们仍然要对活动进行很好的回味总结。对成功之处归纳经验以继续发扬,不足之处吸取教训以将来改之,使我社团工作在“总结—改进—实践”中不断前进。

“纵横杯”辩论赛

同计算机协会、书法协会、民乐社、大学生实践服务社、语艺社、思禹文学社、自考协会联合举办的辩论赛中,彼此之间竞争当激烈,但同时也拉进了彼此之间的友谊,在辩论赛中继续对生命哲理的感悟,勇往直前。

这种形式的活动旨在锻炼同学们的口才和现场反应能力,使我们的想法更加周密,思维更加敏捷,表达语言组织能力,不断提高知识面的不断拓展,是一次很棒可以升华自己的比赛。

在这场辩论赛中,同学们的表现都相当精彩,渲染了现场气氛,使得整个会场氛围很浓烈,给人们留下深刻的印象。

相关推荐